You are the bread and the knife,
the crystal goblet and the wine. You are the dew on the morning grass
and the burning wheel of the sun.
You are the white apron of the baker
and the marsh birds suddenly in flight.
However, you are not the wind in the orchard,
the plums on the counter,
or the house of cards.
And you are certainly not the pine-scented air.
There is just no way you are the pine-scented air.
It is possible that you are the fish under the bridge,
maybe even the pigeon on the general's head,
but you are not even close
to being the field of cornflowers at dusk.
And a quick look in the mirror will show
that you are neither the boots in the corner
nor the boat asleep in its boathouse.
It might interest you to know,
speaking of the plentiful imagery of the world,
that I am the sound of rain on the roof.
I also happen to be the shooting star,
the evening paper blowing down an alley,
and the basket of chestnuts on the kitchen table.
I am also the moon in the trees
and the blind woman's tea cup.
But don't worry, I am not the bread and the knife.
You are still the bread and the knife.
You will always be the bread and the knife,
not to mention the crystal goblet and--somehow-- the wine.
I read it and I thought "Oh, pretty. But I don't get it. I need to try to understand how these things are different ... like she's too pretty to be as practical as boots or a boat? But not pretty enough to be a field of cornflowers? Is she his warm and slightly homely wife?"
Then I watched the poet recite it ...
& I finally got the joke. Three cheers for being funny and pretty, poem. Mr. Collins, you are indeed the blind woman's tea cup.
3 comments:
lol I'll admit, I didn't realize that he was making fun of love poems either. After reading your "blind woman's teacup" comment, I started thinking, Oh maybe his love is blind and he is trying to describe her in ways that she can experience, but then he was using visual imagery too, so that idea fell apart and I was lost and gave up and watched it. And I said, Ohhhhh. You are right, that is a good poem. Though, I suppose it should be, coming from a poet laureate. Still, nice!
It is fun, huh? It's what I both love and loathe about poetry, or any art, really: humor and imagery, but never being sure of what the poet is really trying to say.
And doesn't it matter what the artist is saying?? It seems wrong to just interpret art however one wants ...
I actually went and watched the rest of the reading and interview with him on Fora.com, and he's funny! I like him a lot. I think if we had read more of his poetry before and gotten this one in context, we might have had a better chance at guessing his meaning. He seems to be a pretty tongue-in-cheek kind of guy.
Post a Comment